Sažetak
The past and ongoing political affairs linked to pandemic particularly in Serbia (which fits the concept of hybrid regime) raised polemic among some lawyers whether the president’s declaration of state of emergency was constitutional or not. This motivates to make Kelsen – Schmitt debate about who ought to be the Guardian of the Constitution alive and draw some parаllels with contemporary hybrid regimes. Some of the problems arisen in hybrid regimes are in relation to the rule of law, the role of the parliament and the constitution. Most contemporary constitutions are based on the rule of law which is exercised through pluralism, free and fair elections, constitutional guarantees of human and minority rights, separation of powers, independent judiciary and obedience to the constitution and the law. Using the example of Serbia, we may see that the rule of law and role of parliament as the bearer of constituent and legislative authority are endangered by potential dictatorship in hybrid regimes.
Ključne reči
Reference
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka.