Sažetak
The present article analyses the case-law of the Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia regarding identification of persons conducted in pre-investigation proceedings and investigation by the police. The basic assumption is that the quality and precision of the criminal procedure rules and judgments of the Supreme Court of Cassation additionally determine the police actions in the conditions of expected harmonization of these rules with the most important scientific findings on factors (‘system variables’) that affect the accuracy of identification. In order to determine how the case-law in Serbia treats certain assertions made in the requests for protection of legality regarding violations of criminal procedure regarding identification of persons, the present article analyzed 33 judgments issued by the Supreme Court of Cassation regarding these requests in the period from 2013 to 2021. Based on the results of the analysis, recommendations regarding improvement of the current criminal procedure rules referred to the identification of persons in Serbia were provided, and that by respecting research-informed standards for the collection, preservation, and presentation of identification evidence.
Ključne reči
Reference
Bošković, A., & Kesić, T. (2020). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet
Brewer, N., & Doyle, J. (2021). Changing the Face of Police Lineups: Delivering More Information From Witnesses. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10 (2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.12.004
Colloff, M. F., Wilson, B. M., Seale-Carlisle, T. M., & Wixted, J. T. (2021). Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (8), e2017292118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017292118
Colloff, M. F., & Wixted, J. T. (2019). Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. Advance online publication, 26, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000218
Fitzgerald, R. J., Price, H. L., Oriet, C., & Charman, S. D. (2013). The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19 (2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030618
Fitzgerald, R. J., Price, H. L., & Valentine, T. (2018). Eyewitness identification: Live, photo and video lineups. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 24 (3), 307–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000164
Ilić, G., Majić, M., Beljanski, S., & Trešnjev, A. (2013). Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: JP Službeni glasnik.
Lawson, V., & Dysart, J. (2012). The showup identification procedure: An exploration of systematic biases. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19 (1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02057.x
Lin, W., Strube, M. J., & Roediger, H. L. (2019). The effects of repeated lineups and delay on eyewitness identification. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4 (1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0168-1
Mickes, L. (2015). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and confidence–accuracy characteristic analysis in investigations of system variables and estimator variables that affect eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4 (2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.003
National Academy of Sciences (2013). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Police Executive Research Forum (2013). A National Survey of Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Law Enforcement Agencies, document number 242617. http://www.policeforum.org/
Price, H. L., Harvey, M. B., Anderson, S. F., Chadwick, L., & Fitzgerald, R. J. (2019). Evidence for the Belief in Live Lineup Superiority. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34 (3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9305-x
Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2016). Repeated eyewitness identification procedures with the same suspect. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5 (3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.06.010
Steblay, N. K., Tix, R. W., & Benson, S. L. (2013). Double exposure: The effects of repeated identification lineups on eyewitness accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27 (5), 644–654. doi:10.1002/acp.2944
Škulić, M. (2020). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavaštvo
Škulić, M. (2007). Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: JP Službeni glasnik
Wells, G. L. (2018). Eyewitness identification. In Erik, L. (Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: Volume 2, Policing (pp. 259‐278). Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law: Tempe, AZ. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/58002
Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C. A., & Wixted, J. T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44 (1), 3–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359
Wilford, M. M., & Wells, G. L. (2013). Eyewitness system variables: Revisiting the system-variable concept and the transfer of system variables to the legal system. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 23– 43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14094-002
Wixted, T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13 (3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617734878
Wooten, A. R., Carlson, C. A., Lockamyeir, R. F., Carlson, M. A., Jones, A. R., Dias, J. L., & Hemby. J. A. (2020). The number of fillers may not matter as long as they all match the description: The effect of simultaneous lineup size on eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34 (3), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3644