Sažetak
Prosocijalno ponašanje se odnosi na širok spektar akcija usmjerenih na postizanje koristi za druge prije nego na postizanje vlastite koristi, formirajući različite tipove prosocijalnih tendencija, koje su povezane s različitim individualnim karakteristikama. Također, postoje spolne razlike u tipovima prosocijalnog ponašanja u koje se žene i muškarci upuštaju. Stoga je cilj ovog istraživanja bio ispitati osobine ličnosti povezane s različitim oblicima prosocijalnih tendencija, te rodne razlike u ovim odnosima. Podaci su prikupljeni on-line na ukupno 905 sudionika (81% ženskog spola; Mdob = 24.30, SD = 6.52) putem Mjere prosocijalnih tendencija (Prosocial Tendencies Measure; koja obuhvaća 6 tipova prosocijalnih tendencija: altruistične, poslušne, emocionalne, hitne, javne i anonimne), Deset-čestičnog inventara ličnosti (Ten Item Personality Invenotry) i Kratkog upitnika Mračne trijade (Short Dark Triad). Rezultati hijerarhijske regresijske analize (s temeljnim crtama ličnosti u prvom koraku, te mračnim crtama u drugom) su pokazale da su, iako je postotak objašnjene varijance u svim tipovima prosocijalnih tendencija bio skroman (do ukupno 24%), temeljne crte ličnosti više doprinijele objašnjenju javnih prosocijalnih tendencija kod muškaraca nego kod žena. Mračne crte su imale (negativan) doprinos objašnjenju altruističnih prosocijalnih tendencija i kod muškaraca i kod žena, te doprinos objašnjenju emocionalnih, hitnih i poslušnih prosocijalnih tendencija iznad temeljnih crta ličnosti samo kod žena. Općenito, rezultati su pokazali zanimljive obrasce, naglašavajući spolne razlike u odnosu crta ličnosti i prosocijalnih tendencija.
Ključne reči
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Reference
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.D. (2007). Confidence Intervals for an Effect Size Measure in Multiple Linear Regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 207-218. doi:10.1177/0013164406292030
Algina, J., Keselman, H.J., & Penfield, R.J. (2008). Note on a Confidence Interval for the Squared Semipartial Correlation Coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 734-741. doi:10.1177/0013164407313371
Batson, C.D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001
Batson, C.D., & Powell, A.A. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In T. Millon& M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. Vol. 5. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). The Presence of Others, Prosocial Traits, Machiavellianism. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238-245. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 530-541. doi:10.1177/1948550616639650
Carlo, G., & Randall, B.A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. doi:10.1023/a:1014033032440
Eagly, A.H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.644
Eberly-Lewis, M.B., & Coetzee, T.M. (2015). Dimensionality in adolescent prosocial tendencies: Individual differences in serving others versus serving the self. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.032
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., & Spinrad, T.L. (2007). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311
Espinosa, M.P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088
Frieze, I.H., & Li, M.Y. (2010). Gender, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior. In J.C. Chrisler& D.R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. (pp. 311-335). New York, NY: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_13
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1
Schroeder, D.A., Graziano, W.G., Graziano, W.G., & Habashi, M.M. (2015). Searching for the Prosocial Personality. In D.A. Schroeder & W.G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. (pp. 231-255). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.017
Jonason, P.K., Li, N.P., Webster, G.D., & Schmitt, D.P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5-18. doi:10.1002/per.698
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2012). Differentiating the Dark Triad Within the Interpersonal Circumplex. In L.M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. (pp. 249-267). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118001868.ch15
Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. doi:10.1177/1073191113514105
Jones, D.N., & Weiser, D.A. (2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20-24. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.007
Kauten, R., & Barry, C.T. (2014). Do you think I’m as kind as I do? The relation of adolescent narcissism with self- and peer-perceptions of prosocial and aggressive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 69-73. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.014
Kauten, R.L., & Barry, C.T. (2016). Adolescent narcissism and its association with different indices of prosocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 36-45. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.004
Konrath, S., Ho, M., & Zarins, S. (2016). The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors. Current Psychology, 35(2), 182-194. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9417-3
Lannin, D.G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127-132. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.035
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183-204. doi:10.1177/1745691616666070
Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
Rauthmann, J.F., & Kolar, G.P. (2012). How "dark", are the Dark Triad traits?, Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884-889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliability of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2119-2125. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J.F. (2001). On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182-186. doi:10.1198/000313001317097960
White, B.A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116-121. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.033
Wertag, A., Vrselja, I., & Tomić, T. (2011). Assessing Construct Validity of Paulhus's and Williams's (2002) Dark Triad Questionnaire D3-27 / Provjera konstruktne valjanosti Paulhusovog i Williamsovog (2002) upitnika Mračne trijade D3-27. In: 19th Annual Conference of Croatian Psychologists. Osijek, Croatia.
Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.3.395
Zuo, S., Wang, F., Xu, Y., Wang, F., & Zhao, X. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the Dark Gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual's self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272-276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima. Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo – Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) . Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i
originalno. Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni, u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu, uz adekvatno referisanje.