Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to identify factors associated with pro-integration attitudes to the European Union (EU) among Serbian medical freshmen to promote integration.
Methods: In the period from 2010 to 2021, within the scope of the distance learning module "Medicine & Society", a total of 1333 freshmen of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Belgrade (1333/1940, i.e., response rate 68.7%) has responded to the semi-structured questionnaire inquiring their perception of the EU integration advantages and disadvantages.
The association of the pro-EU attitude (vs cons-EU / undecided) with perceived advantages and disadvantages was presented using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: A total of 48.5% of respondents were pro-EU integration, 42.7% were undecided and 8.9% were cons-EU (i.e., 585, 525, and 107, respectively) integration of Serbia. The pro-EU attitude was 55% more likely among male respondents (OR: 1.55, 95% CI:1.14-2.10), among respondents who were able to identify advantages of EU integration such as easier mobility (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.80-4.57), variety of job opportunities (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.45-2.93), and among those for whom competition at the EU healthcare market is not a disadvantage of the EU-integration (OR: 8.56, 95% CI: 1.79-40.92). The pro-EU attitude was less likely among respondents who identified high emigration of medical doctors as a disadvantage of the EU integration, by 45% (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.84).
Conclusion: During the last decade, the share of Serbian medical freshmen with pro-EU and undecided attitudes suggests the need for a stronger international initiative of EU and national actors. Advantages such as easier mobility, competition in the EU healthcare market, and a variety of employment opportunities promote an integrationist attitude, in contrast to the large emigration of medical doctors.
Keywords
Array
Array
Array
References
Pjevović D, Subotic S. EU Sentiments of Serbia’s citizens. Policy. Belgrade; 2019.
Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):1–26.
Stojković D, Glišić M. Defence and Peace Economics Serbia ’ s Military Neutrality : Is It Economically Beneficial ? Def Peace Econ. 2018;00(00):1–17.
OSF. Working Together to Address Health Workforce Mobility in Europe Recommendations for Action. 2020.
Buchan J, Wismar M, Glinos IA BJ, editor. Health professional mobility in a changing Europe: new dynamics, mobile individuals and diverse responses. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2014.
Bonica A, Rosenthal H, Rothman DJ. Physician activism in American politics : The opposition to the Price nomination. PlosOne. 2019;e0215802.
Virchow R. Der Armenarzt. Med Reform. 1848;18:125–7.
Winslow CE. THE UNTILLED FIELDS OF PUBLIC HEALTH. Science. 1920 Jan;51(1306):23–33.
European Commission. Serbia 2020 Report. Brussels; 2020.
Herfs PGP. Aspects of medical migration with particular reference to the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(59):1–7.