Politički marketing i strategije digitalnih iluzija – primeri iz Venecuele i Brazila
Scindeks Asistent Scindeks Asistent — sistem za ozbiljne časopise i one koji to žele da postanu
PDF

Sažetak

Država predstavlja fenomen koji stalno menja svoju formu, kao i politički akteri unutar nje. Pravac tih promena u određenoj meri zavisi od razvoja tehnologije. Nove informaciono-komunikacione tehnologije i uspon društvenih mreža uticali su na modernu političku komunikaciju. Ovaj rad razmatra na koji način se eksploatišu digitalni alati u nepredvidljivom društvenom ambijentu kojeg odlikuju brojne političke krize. Posebnu pažnju posvetili smo fenomenu digitalnog astroturfinga i širenja političkih dezinformacija u Venecueli i Brazilu. Brzi tehnološki razvoj u kombinaciji sa korišćenjem političkih botova stvara potencijal za širenje lažnih vesti, što utiče na demokratičnost izbornog procesa. Stoga je neophodno podrobnije istražiti ove fenomene.

Ključne reči

Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
DOI: 10.5937/socpreg54-27846

Reference

Alexander, J., & Smith, J. (2010). Disinformation: A taxonomy. IEEE Security & Privacy, 9(1), 58–63.

Bayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakács, J., Alemanno, A., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda–impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States. HEC Paris Research Paper No. LAW-2019-1341.

Bittman, L. (1981). Soviet Bloc ‘Disinformation’ and other ‘Active Measures’. In Pfaltzgraff, R, L., Ra’anan, U., Milberg, W. (eds., 2019). Intelligence Policy and National Security (212–228). London: Palgrave Macmillan

Deseriis, M. (2017). Direct Parliamentarianism: An Analysis of the Political Values Embedded in Rousseau, the” Operating System” of the Five STAR Movement In 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM) (pp. 15–25). IEEE.

Edelman (2019). 2019 Edelman Trust Barometеr: Global Report. Edelman. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf

Forelle, M., Howard, P., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Savage, S. (2015). Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.07109.

Hellmann, O. (2017). Populism in East Asia. In Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O., Ostiguy, P. (eds., 2017) The Oxford Handbook of Populism (161–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hernon, P. (1995). Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study. Government information quarterly, 12(2), 133–139.

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New media & society, 4(3), 355–383.

Kos-Stanišić, L. (2004). Venezuela – Democracy or Semi-Democracy? Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 41(4), 92–112 [In Croatian]

Krstić, Z. (2014). Latin America: Challenges and Obstacles to Democratization. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka [In Serbian]

Lanoszka, A. (2019). Disinformation in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 227–248.

Lukić, R. (1981). Political parties. Beograd: Naučna knjiga. [In Serbian]

Lee, C. W. (2010). The roots of astroturfing. Contexts, 9(1), 73–75.

Moffitt, B. (2014). Contemporary Populism and “The People” in the Asia-Pacific Region. In C. de la Torre (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives (293–316). Lexington (KY): University Press of Kentucky

Morales, J. S. (2020). Perceived Popularity and Online Political Dissent: Evidence from Twitter in Venezuela. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 5–27.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.

Orlović, S. (2008). Political life of Serbia: between partocracy and democracy. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]

Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. Internet culture, 201, 218.

Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204.

Ruediger, M. A., Grassi, A., Guedes, A. L., Borghi, J., Silva, L. R. D., & Carvalho, D. (2018). Bots, social networks and politics in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV DAPP

Repeating Islands, (2011, September 21). Venezuela gives free laptops to school children. Repeating Islands. https://repeatingislands.com/2011/09/21/venezuela-gives-free-laptops-to-school-children/

Sader, E. (2008). The weakest link? Neoliberalism in Latin America. New Left Review, (52), 5.

Smiljković, R. (2013). Serbs in imperial clashes. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]

Stanard, M. G. (2011). Selling the Congo: A history of European pro-empire propaganda and the making of Belgian imperialism. University of Nebraska Press

van Dijk, T. A. (2017). How globo media manipulated the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 199–229.

Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 471–484.

Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161

Preuzimanja

Podaci o preuzimanju još nisu dostupni.