Sažetak
Budući da je koncept diskursa postao gotovo nezaobilazan u savremenim proučavanjima velikog broja društvenih i političkih fenomena, te da kao takav predstavlja transdisciplinarni instrument društvene analize i kritike, nesporna je važnost ukazivanja na to u čemu se sastoji njegova teorijsko-metodološka relevantnost. S tim ciljem u radu je data geneza ovog polivalentnog pojma, kroz razvojni prikaz različitih analitičkih nivoa njegovog razmatranja, a u kontekstu opštih okvira naučnih uvida relevantnih za njegovu teorijsku operacionalizaciju. Posebnu analitičku pažnju dobile su koncepcije Mišela Fukoa i Jirgena Habermasa, ne samo zato što je reč o dvema najuticajnijim teorijama diskursa u dvadesetom veku, već i stoga što razlike između njihovih shvatanja pružaju celoviti uvid u važnost ovog pojma.
Ključne reči
diskurs
jezik
tekst
moć
Reference
Bugarski, R. (1989). Introduction to General Linguistics. Beograd: BIGZ [In Serbian]
Derrida, J. (1990). White Mythology. Novi Sad: Bratstvo-jedinstvo [In Serbian]
Flyvbjerg, В. (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society. The British Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), 210–233. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237923
Foucault, М. (2007). Order of Discourse. Loznica: Karpos [In Serbian]
Foucault, М. (1998). Archeology of Knowledge. Beograd: Plato [In Serbian]
Foucault, M. (2010). Writings and Conversations. Beograd: Fedon [In Serbian]
Habermas, J. (1980). Theory and Practice - Socio-Philosophical Studies. Beograd: BIGZ [In Serbian]
Halliday, M. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold
Halliday, M. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold
Halliday, M. (2003). On Language and Linguistics, London and New York: Continuum
Holzscheiter, А. (2014). Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 15, 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12005
Kelly, M. (ed., 1994). Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nikolić, M. (2013). Linguistic Means for Expressing Power in Confrontational Discourse (doctoral dissertation). Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filološki fakultet. Beograd. Available at: https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:8041/bdef:Content/get [In Serbian]
Pavićević, Đ. (1995). Ethics of Discourse. Philosophy and Society VII, 129–157. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut društvenih nauka - Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju [In Serbian]
Pešić, M. (2011). Conceptual Basis of Research on Discourse: Relation Power, Politics and Democracy. Srpska politička misao 4/2011, 309-334. https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.3442011.16 [In Serbian]
Pešić, M. (2016) Satirical Literary Projections of Social and Political Reality in the Public Sphere of Serbia at the End of XIX and Beginning of XX Century (doctoral dissertation). Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka. Beograd. Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/6931?show=full [In Serbian]
Ristić, D. (2015).Meanings of Action: Sociological Analysis Discursive Practices of Ideology (doctoral dissertation). Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet. Novi Sad. Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/4509 [In Serbian]
Searle, Rogers J. (1991). Speech Acts. Beograd: Nolit [In Serbian]
Simić, R., Jovanović, J. (2009). About Discourse. Uzdanica, 6 (2), 7–21.
Škiljan, D. (1980). A View on Linguistics. Zagreb: Školska knjiga [In Serbian]
Willa, D. (1992). Postmodernism and the Public Sphere. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No 3/ 2002, 712–721.
Živković, B. (2014). Conversation Analysis: from Sociology to Linguistics. In S. Perović (ed.) Discourse Analysis: Theories and Methods (77–95). Podgorica: Institute of Foreign Languages, University of Montenegro