Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Tokom zadnjih godina rasprostranjeno korišćenje mobilnih telefona ima za posledicu povećano izlaganje ljudi zračenju elektromagnetnog polja, a time i rizicima za svoje zdravlje. Povećano korišćenje mobilnih telefona na malom rastojanju nameće pitanja i izaziva sumnju u bezbednost njihovih korisnika. Cilj ove studije bio je da utvrdi izloženost korisnika mobilnih telefona zračenju elektromagnetnog polja merenjem jačine elektromagnetnog polja u različitim okruženjima na rastojanju od 1 do 30 cm od korisnika telefona. Metode. U ovoj studiji vršena su merenja izloženosti korisnika raznih marki mobilnih telefona zračenja elektromagnetnog polja mobilnih telefona pomoću faktora koji se odnose na poziv: gradska/seoska zona, zatvoren/otvoren prostor i kretanje/mirovanje tokom poziva. Razni tipovi mobilnih telefona postavljani su okrenuti prema sondi za merenje na rastojanja od 1 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm i 30 cm. Rezultati. Najjače elektromagnetno polje zabeleženo je kod poziva u seoskoj zoni (zatvoren prostor), dok je najslabije zabeleženo za one u gradskoj zoni (otvoren prostor). Pozivi sa telefona iz kola koja se kreću pokazali su slične rezultate kao pozivi iz zatvorenog prostora; međutim, pozivi sa telefona iz kola koja se kreću izlažu korisnika duplo jačem električnom polju nego pozivi iz mirovanja (bez kretanja). Zaključak. Zračenje elektromagnetnog polja zavisi od snage mobilnog telefona i faktora kao što su gradska ili seoska sredina, otvoren ili zatvoren prostor, kretanje ili mirovanje, i rastojanje mobilnog telefona od korisnika telefona. Preporučljivo je držati mobilni telefon na bezbednom rastojanju – 10, 20 ili 30 cm od tela (naročito glave) tokom razgovora.
Ključne reči
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Reference
Hardell L, Sage C. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmaco-ther 2008; 62(2): 104−9.
Krewski D, Glickman BW, Habash RW, Habbick B, Lotz WG, Mandeville R, et al. Recent advances in research on radiofre-quency fields and health: 2001-2003. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2007; 10(4): 287−318.
Munshi A, Jalali R. Cellular phones and their hazards: the cur-rent evidence. Natl Med J India 2002; 15(5): 275−7.
Valuntaite V, Girgzdiene R. Investigation of ozone emission and dispersion from photocopying machines. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2007; 15(2): 61−7.
Vaisis V, Janusevicius T. Investigation and evaluation of noise level in the Northern part of Klaipeda city. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2008; 16(2): 89−96.
Usman A, Wan Ahmad W, Ab Kadir M, Mokhtar M. Wireless Phones Electromagnetic Field Radiation Exposure Assess-ment. Am J Eng Appl Sci 2009; 4 (2): 771−4.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part II: Radiofrequency elec-tromagnetic fields. Lyon, France: International Agency for Re-search on Cancer; 2011.
Akbal A, Kiran Y, Sahin A, Turgut-Balik D, Balik H. Effects of electromagnetic waves emitted by mobile phones on germina-tion, root growth, and root tip cell mitotic division of Lens cu-linaris Medik. Pol J Environ Stud 2012; 21(1): 23−9.
Baltrenas P, Fröhner K, Puzinas D. Investigation of noise dispersion from seaport equipment on the enterprise territory and residential environment. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2007; 15(2): 85−92.
Damian C, Foşalău С. Sources of indoor noise and options to minimize adverse human health effects. Environ Eng Manage J 2011; 10(3): 393−400.
Bahr A, Dorn H, Bolz T. Dosimetric assessment of an exposure system for simulating GSM and WCDMA mobile phone us-age. Bioelectromagnetics 2006; 27(4): 320–7.
Januseviciene I, Venckus Z. The numerical modeling of nitrogen oxides and coal monoxide in the atmosphere when applying PHOENICS programme. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2011; 3(19): 225–33.
Paulauskas L, Klimas R. Modelling of the spread of motor transport noise in Siauliai city. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2011; 1(19): 62–70.
Hillert L, Ahlbom A, Neasham D, Feychting M, Järup L, Navin R, et al. Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006; 16(6): 507−14.
INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile phone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39(3): 675−94.
Bednarek K. Electromagnetic Action of Heavy-Current Equip-ment Operating With Power Frequency. Int J Occup Saf Er-gon 2010; 16(3): 357−68.
Baltrenas P, Buckus R, Vasarevicus S. Modelling of the Computer Classroom Electromagnetic Field. Electron Electric Eng 2011; 109(3): 75–80.
Baltrenas P, Buckus R. The exploration and assessment of elec-tromagnetics fields in duplicators. . J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 2009; 17(2): 89−96. (Lithuanian)
Dolan M, Rowley J. The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radio frequency exposures. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117(9): 1329–32.
Grigoriev J. Electromagnetic Fields and the Public: EMF Standards and Estimation of Risk. Earth Environ Sci 2010; 10(1): 1–6.
Lin JC. Cellular mobile phones and children. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 2002; 44 (5): 142-5.
Mousa A. Electromagnetic Radiation Measurements and Safety Issues of some Cellular Base Stations in Nablus. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 2011; 1(4): 35−42.
Loughran SP, Wood AW, Barton JM, Croft RJ, Thompson B, Stough C. The effect of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones on human sleep. Neuroreport 2005; 16(17): 1973−6.
Psenakova Z, Hudecova J. Influence of Electromagnetic Fields by Electronic Implants in Medicine. Electron Electric Eng 2009; 95 (7): 37–40.
Ahlbom A, Cardis E, Green A, Linet M, Savitz D, Swerdlow A. Review of epidemiologic literature on EMF and health. Envi-ron Health Perspect 2001; 109(Suppl 6): 911–33.
Received on Januar