Abstract
Apstrakt
Uvod/Cilj. Prema “vaskularnoj” teoriji arterijski priliv u gornjoj hemoroidalnoj arteriji dovodi do dilatacije hemoroidalnog venskog pleksusa. Laser hemoroidoplastika (LHP) je novi postupak primenjen u ambulantnom lečenju hemoroida u kojem se hemoroidalni arterijski protok krvi koji ishranjuje hemoroidalni pleksus zaustavlja laserskom koagulacijom. Cilj ove studije bio je poređenje između grupa bolesnika lečenih sa dve različite metode, laserom (LHP) i sa otvorenom hirurškom metodom – Milligan Morgan (MM). Metode. U ovu studiju bilo je uključeno 200 bolesnika sa hemoroidima trećeg stepena, starijih od 18 godina, od kojih je 100 bilo tretirano LHP metodom, dok je ostalih 100 bolesnika tretirano Milligan-Morgan hemoroidiektomijom. Parametri koji su se koristili za poređenje dve hirurške metode bili su: dužina hospitalizacije, postoperativni bol, prisustvo krvarenja i vreme potrebno da se bolesnici vrate normalnom životu. Rezultati. Rezutati su pokazali statistički značajnu razliku među metodama. Nivo postoperativnog bola bio je niži kod bolesnika u grupi lečenih LHP u odnosu na grupu bolesnika lečenih MM metodom (p < 0,0001). U grupi tretiranoj metodom LHP, krvarenje je bilo manje u odnosu na grupu koja je tretirana otvorenom hirurškom metodom (MM). Trajanje operacije, kao i dužina hospitalizacije bili su znatno kraći u grupi sa hemoroidoplastikom (LHP) u odnosu na grupu sa hemoroidektomijom (MM metoda). Zaključak. Dobijeni rezultati upućuju na značajne prednosti LHP metode u odnosu na metodu Milligan Morgan kod bolesnika sa hemoroidima trećeg stepena.
Keywords
Array
Array
Array
Array
References
REFERENCES
Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastro¬ente¬ro-logy 1990; 98(2): 380–6.
Rogozina VA. Hemorrhoids. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol 2002; (4): 93–6, 134. (Russian)
Plapler H, Hage R, Duarte J, Lopes N, Masson I, Cazarini C, et al. A new method for hemorrhoid surgery: intrahemorrhoidal di¬ode laser, does it work? Photomed Laser Surg 2009; 27(5): 819–23.
Parks AG. De haemorrhois; a study in surgical history. Guys Hosp Rep 1955; 104(2): 135–56.
Keighley MR, Williams NS. Surgery of the anus, rectum and co-lon. London: WB Saunders; 1999.
Haas PA, Fox TA Jr, Haas GP. The pathogenesis of hemorrho-ids. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27(7): 442–50.
Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62(7): 542–52.
MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treat-ment modalities. A meta-analysis. Di. Colon Rectum 1995; 38(7): 687–94.
Monson JRT, Mortenson NJ, Hartley J. Procedures for Prolapsing Hemorrhoids (PPH) or Stapled Anopexy. Consensus Docu-ment for Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. ACPGBI; 2003.
Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: Current incidence and complicati-ons of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(5): 477–81.
Sardinha CT, Corman ML. Hemorrhoids. Surg. Clin North Am 2002; 82(6): 1153–67, vi.
Goligher J, Duthie H, Nixon H. Surgery of the anus rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1984.
Salfi R. A new technique for ambulantory hemorrhoidal treat-ment. Doppler-guided laser photocoagulation of hemorrhoidal arteries. Coloproctology 2009; 31(2): 99–103.
Chia YW, Darzi A, Speakman CT, Hill AD, Jameson JS, Henry MM. CO2 laser haemorrhoidectomy--does it alter anorectal function or decrease pain compared to conventional haemor-rhoidectomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10(1): 22–4.
Barcly L. Best option for evaluating and treating hemorrhoids. BMJ 2008; 336: 380–3.
Crea N, Pata G, Lippa M, Chiesa D, Gregorini ME, Gandolfi P. He¬morrhoidal laser procedure: short- and long-term results from a prospective study. Am J Surg 2014; 208(1): 21–5.
Naderan M, Shoar S, Nazari M, Elsayed A, Mahmoodzadeh H, Khor¬gami Z. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser Intra-Hemorrhoidal Coagulation and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy. J Invest Surg 2016; 2: 1–7.
Leardi S, Pessia B, Mascio M, Piccione F, Schietroma M, Pietroletti R.Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20(11): 1886–90.
Milligan ET, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937; 2: 1119–24.
Voigtsberger A, Popovicova L, Bauer G, Werner K, Weitschat-Benser T, Petersen S. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: functional results, re-currence rate, and prognosticfactors in a single center analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31(1): 35–9.
LaBella GD, Main WP, Hussain LR. Evaluation of transanal he¬morrhoidal dearterialization: A single surgeon experience. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19(3): 153–7.
De Nardi P, Tamburini AM, Gazzetta PG, Lemma M, Pascariello A, Asteria CR. Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: Results from a multicenter pro-spective study. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20(7): 455–9.
Sammarco G, Ferrari F, Carpino A, Russo E, Vescio G, Ammendola M, et al. PPH vs Milligan-Morgan: Early and late complicati¬ons in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with circumfe¬rential prolapse. Ann Ital Chir 2014; 85(5): 464–.
Majeed S, Naqvi SR, Tariq M, Ali MA.Comparison of Open and Closed Techniques of Haemorrhoidectomy in Terms of Post-Operative Complications. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015; 27(4): 791–3.
Avital S, Itah R, Skornick Y, Greenberg R. Outcome of stapled he¬morrhoidopexy versus doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15(3): 267–71.
Gain Yu M. Laser Tecnologies in Complex Tretmant of Hemo¬rrhoids. Novosti Khirurgii 2013; 21(1): 94–104.
Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R. Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18(11): 1081–5.
Gemici K, Okuş A, Serden A. Vascular Z-shaped ligation techni¬que in surgical treatment of haemorrhoid. World J Gastroin¬test Surg 2015; 7(1): 10–4.