Ortotopska ilealna neobešika kreirana po originalnoj hirurškoj metodi “Belgrade pouch”– desetogodišnje iskustvo
Scindeks Asistent Scindeks Asistent — sistem za ozbiljne časopise i one koji to žele da postanu
PDF (engleski)

Sažetak

Uvod/Cilj. Princip kontinentnih urinarnih derivacija je zasnovan na kreiranju arteficijalnog rezervoara za urin, što sličnijeg mokraćnoj bešici, adekvatnog kapaciteta, visokog stepena kontinencije, niskog pritiska i što manje resorptivne površine, u cilju sprečavanja pojave metaboličkih komplikacija. Metode. Prospektivnom i delom retrospektivnom studijom obuhvaćeno je 148 bolesnika koji su u periodu od 10 godina  bili operisani zbog tumora mokraćne bešike ograničenog na organ sa invazijom mišićnog sloja (pT2), i kojima je nakon radikalne cistektomije originalnom hirurškom tehnikom Belgrade pouch kreirana neobešika od kratkog segmenta ileuma u obliku slova „U“, prosečne dužine 30 cm. Period praćenja posle operacije iznosio je tri godine. Rezultati. Kod 126 muškaraca i 22 žene operisanih tehnikom kreiranja neobešike Belgrade pouch, posle tri godine prosečna zapremina neobešike bila je 477 (330–659) mL, zapremina rezidualng urina je bila klinički beznačajna [52 (0–92) mL], a prosečna frekvencija 24-časovnog mokrenja iznosila je pet puta na dan. Dnevnu kontinenciju je imalo 90% operisanih, a noćnu 88%. Kod 7% bolesnika utvrđena je blaga acidoza, a kod 3% nedostatak vitamina B12. Zaključak. Neobešika kreirana po metodi Belgrade pouch pokazala je odlične rezultate, uporedive sa standardnim tehnikama obezbeđujući odličan kapacitet, visok stepen kontinencije, dobru 24-časovnu frekvenciju mokrenja, beznačajan rezidualni urin i značajno nižu stopu metaboličkih komplikacija u trogodišnjem periodu praćenja.

Ključne reči

Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
DOI: 10.2298/VSP190202085B

Reference

Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Mus-cle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2017; 71(3): 462‒75.

Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, Pantvaidya GH. Long-term results of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2003; 91(6): 485‒8.

Hautmann RE, Botto H, Studer UE. How to obtain good results with orthotopic bladder substitution: The 10 commandments. Eur Urol Suppl 2009; 8(9): 712‒7.

Thurairaja R, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. Orthotopic Neoblad-der. BJU Int. 2008; 102 (9 Pt B): 1307‒13.

Bachor R, Frohneberg D, Miller K, Egghart G, Hautmann R. Con-tinence after total bladder replacement: urodynamic analysis of the ileal neobladder. Br J Urol 1990; 65(5): 462‒6.

Constantinides C, Manousakas T, Chrisofos M, Giannopoulos A. Orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy: 5 years of experience with a novel personal modification of the ileal s pouch. J Urol 2001; 166(2): 532‒7.

Aleksic P, Bancevic V, Milovic N, Kosevic B, Stamenkovic DM, Ka-ranikolas M, et al. Short ileal segment for orthotopic neoblad-der: a feasibility study. Int J Urol 2010; 17(9): 768‒73.

Stenzl A, Sherif H, Kuczyk M. Radical cystectomy with ortho-topic neobladder for invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of long term oncological, functional and quality of life results. Int Braz J Urol 2010; 36(5): 537‒47.

Thurairaja R, Studer UE. How to avoid clean intermittent catheterization in men with ileal bladder substitution. J Urol 2008; 180(6): 2504‒9.

Varol C, Studer UE. Managing patients after an ileal orthotop-ic bladder substitution. BJU Int 2004; 93: 266–70.

Kassouf W1, Hautmann RE, Bochner BH, Lerner SP, Colombo R, Zlotta A, et al. A critical analysis of orthotopic bladder substi-tutes in adult patients with bladder cancer: Is there a perfect solution? Eur Urol 2010; 58(3): 374‒83.

Bancević V, Aleksić P, Milović N, Kosević B, Campara Z, Stamen-ković D. Post-voiding residual urine and capacity increase in orthotopic urinary diversion-standard vs. modified technique. Vojnosanit Pregl 2010; 67(7): 558‒61. (Serbian)

Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous-lined extramural ureteral reim-plantation: experience with 450 patients. J Urol 2001; 165(5): 1427‒32.

Lawrentschuk N, Colombo R, Hakenberg OW, Lerner SP, Månsson W, Sagalowsky A, et al. Prevention and management of com-plications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6): 983‒1001.

Shaaban AA, Abdel-Latif M, Mosbah A, Gad H, Eraky I, Ali-El-Dein B, et al. A randomized study comparing an antireflux sys-tem with a direct ureteric anastomosis in patients with ortho-topic ileal neobladders. BJU Int 2006; 97(5): 1057‒62.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Minja A, De Marco V, Artibani W. Func-tional results following vescica ileale Padovana (VIP) ne-obladder: midterm follow-up analysis with validated question-naires. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6): 1045‒51.

Bancevic V , Aleksic P, Milovic N, Spasić A, Kovačević B, Tošev-ski P, et al. Radical cystectomy in eldery. Vojnosanit pregl 2015 72(2): 136‒9.

Nesrallah LJ, Srougi M, Dall'Oglio MF. Orthotopic ileal ne-obladder: the influence of reservoir volume and configuration on urinary continence and emptying properties. BJU Int 2004; 93(3): 375‒8.

Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Hochreiter WW, et al. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal or-thotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004; 172(4 Pt 1): 1323‒7.

Granberg CF, Boorjian SA, Crispen PL, Tollefson MK, Farmer SA, Frank I, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in women. BJU Int 2008; 102(11): 1551‒5.

Košević B, Aleksić P, Milović N, Banfevit V, Stamenković D, Nikolić I, et al. Urodynamic characteristics of the modified orthotopic ileal neobladder. Vojnosanit Pregl 2012; 69(3): 253‒6.

Roehrborn CG, Teigland CM, Sagalowsky AI. Functional carac-teristics of the Camey ileal bladder. J Urol 1987; 138(4): 739‒42.

El Bahnasawy MS, Osman Y, Gomha MA, Shaaban AA, Asha-mallah A, Ghoneim MA. Nocturnal enuresis in men with an or-thotopic ileal reservoir: urodynamic evaluation. J Urol 2000; 164(1): 10‒3.

Madersbacher S, Möhrle K, Burkhard F, Studer UE. Long-term voiding pattern of patients with ileal orthotopic bladder sub-stitutes. J Urol 2002; 167(5): 2052‒7.

Mills RD, Studer UE. Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1999; 161(4): 1057‒66.

Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Mills R, Studer UE. Continent uri-nary diversion. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006; 57(3): 255‒64.

Bančević V, Aleksić P, Stamenković D, Pejčić T, Milović N, Kovačević B, et al. Neobladder “Belgrade pouch”: Metabolic considera-tion. Vojnosanit Pregl 2016; 73(7): 626‒30.

Pajor L. Metabolic conrequences of urinary derivation and bladder substitution. In: Kropfl D, Novak R, Tucak A. Editors. Reconstructive urinary surgery, Zagreb: Medicinska naklada; 1999. p. 243‒6. (Croatian)

Giannini S, Nobile M, Sartori L, Aragona F, Ruffato A, Dalle Carbonare L, et al. Bone density and skeletal metabolism in pa-tients with orthotopic ileal neobladder. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8(10): 1553‒9.

Aleksić P, Bančević V. Creating a neobladder from small intes-tine. Beograd: Draslar publications; 2015. (Serbian)

Mills RD, Studer UE. Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. The J Urol 1999; 161(4): 1057‒66.

Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal or-thotopic low pressure bladder substitute--lessons to be learned. J Urol 2006; 176(1): 161‒6.

Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Vries RR, Bex A, van der Poel HG, Mein-hardt W, Antonini N, et al. Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and function-al results of four different diversions. Eur Urol 2008; 53(4): 834‒42; discussion 842‒4.

Preuzimanja

Podaci o preuzimanju još nisu dostupni.