Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. U literaturi postoji mali broj radova o uticaju perinatalne hipoksije (PH) na jezičke sposobnosti dece starijeg uzrasta. Takođe, ne postoje studije o uticaju PH na obim i težinu jezičkog deficita dece sa razvojnim jezičkim poremećajem (RJP). Cilj rada bio je da se ispitaju razlike u leksičko-semantičkim (LS) sposobnostima dece sa RJP i sa istorijom PH (RJPph) i dece sa RJP bez neuroloških faktora rizika (RJPbnfr). Metode. Uzorak je činilo 96 dece uzrasta od 5 do 8 godina, svrstanih u tri grupe: RJPph grupa (25 dece), RJPbnfr grupa (30 dece) i grupa od 41 tipično razvijene (TR) dece istog uzrasta. U cilju poređenja razlika koje zavise od uzrasta, formirane su i dve dodatne starosne grupe – deca predškolskog i deca školskog uzrasta (5–6 i 7–8 godina, redom). Za merenje LS sposobnosti primenjeni su specifični testovi za procenu obima ekspresivnog vokabulara (EV), semantičkog procesiranja (SP) i leksičke produktivnosti (LPr). Za procenu LPr primenjena je mera računanja leksičke raznovrsnosti u uzorku spontanog govora. Rezultati. Rezultati su pokazali statistički značajne razlike između grupa RJPph i RJPbnfr na testu procene SP (p < 0,05), ali ne i na testovima za procenu EV (p = 0,350) i LPr (p = 0,118). Međutim, detaljna analiza razvojnih tendencija dece predškolskog i ranog školskog uzrasta pokazala je da su deca iz grupe RJPph značajno napredovala samo u domenu EV (p < 0,01), dok su deca iz grupe RJPbnfr značajno napredovala u domenu EV i SP (p < 0,001). Što se tiče razvojnih tendencija u domenu LPr, ni u jednoj od dve grupe sa RJP nije utvrđen značajan napredak. Zaključak. Kod RJPph dece, teža forma LS deficita u oblasti sposobnosti SP može biti povezana sa PH. Takođe, PH može doprineti sporijem napredovanju šireg spektra LS sposobnosti.
Ključne reči
Array
Array
Array
Reference
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Garden City, NY: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. Leonard LB. Children with specific language impairment. London: MIT Press; 2014.
3. Bishop DV. Uncommon Understanding (Classic Edition): Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. London: Psychology Press; 2013.
4. La Paro KM, Justice L, Skibbe LE, Pianta RC. Relations among maternal, child, and demographic factors and the persistence of preschool language impairment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2004; 13(4): 291‒303.
5. Rice ML, Taylor CL, Zubrick SR. Language outcomes of 7-year-old children with or without a history of late language emergence at 24 months. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51(2): 394‒407.
6. McGregor KK, Oleson J, Bahnsen A, Duff D. Children with developmental language impairment have vocabulary deficits characterized by limited breadth and depth. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2013; 48(3): 307–19.
7. Messer D, Dockrell JE. Children's naming and word-finding difficulties: descriptions and explanations. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49(2): 309‒24.
8. Gray S. Word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: effect of phonological or semantic cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48(6): 1452‒67.
9. Nash M, Donaldson ML. Word learning in children with vocabulary deficits. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48(2): 439‒58.
10. Dockrell JE, Messer D, George R, Ralli A. Beyond naming patterns in children with WFDs − definitions for nouns and verbs. J Neuroling 2003; 16: 191–211.
11. Drljan B, Vuković M. Comparison of lexical‐semantic processing in children with developmental language disorder and typically developing peers. Govor 2019; 36(2): 119–38.
12. Sheng L, McGregor KK. Lexical-semantic organization in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear R 2010; 53(1): 146–59.
13. Drljan B, Vuković M. Lexical diversity in narrative discourse of children with specific language impairment. Spec Edu Rehabil 2017; 16(3): 261–87. (Serbian)
14. Thordardottir ET, Namazi M. Specific language impairment in French-speaking children: Beyond grammatical morphology. J Speech Lang Hear R 2007; 50(3): 698–715.
15. Leonard LB, Miller C, Gerber E. Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear R 1999; 42(3): 678–89.
16. Spanoudis, G. Theory of mind and specific language impairment in school-age children. J Commun Disord 2016; 61: 83–96.
17. Marlow N, Rose AS, Rands CE, Draper ES. Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90(5): F380–7.
18. Azzopardi D, Strohm B, Marlow N, Brocklehurst P, Deierl A, Eddama O, et al. TOBY Study Group. Effects of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. N Engl J Med 2014; 371(2): 140–9.
19. Chin EM, Jayakumar S, Ramos E, Gerner G, Soares BP, Cristofalo E, et al. Preschool language outcomes following perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the age of therapeutic hypothermia. Dev Neurosci 2018; 40(5‒6): 627–37.
20. Drljan BJ. Lexical abilities in children with specific language impairment. [dissertation]. Serbia, Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation; 2017. (Serbian)
21. Biro M. Weschler inteligence scale for children. Revised. Belgrade: Serbian Psychological Society; 1997. (Serbian)
22. Bauer DJ, Goldfield BA, Reznick JS. Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Appl Psycholinguist 2002; 23(3): 313–35.
23. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P. Foetal testosterone and vocabulary size in 18- to 24-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev 2002; 24(4): 418–24.
24. Cadime I, Silva C, Ribeiro I, Viana FL. Early lexical development: Do day care attendance and maternal education matter? First Lang 2018; 38(5): 503–19.
25. Campbell TF, Dollaghan CA, Rockette HE, Paradise JL, Feldman HM, Shriberg LD, et al. Risk factors for speech delay of unknown origin in 3-year-old children. Child Dev 2003; 74(2): 346–57.
26. Ghassabian A, Rescorla L, Henrichs J, Jaddoe VW, Verhulst FC, Tiemeier H. Early lexical development and risk of verbal and nonverbal cognitive delay at school age. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103(1): 70–80.
27. Kaplan D, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1983.
28. Kuljić-Obradović D, Ocić G. Clinical characteristics of speech-language dysfunctions in thalamic aphasia. Vojnosanit Pregl 2002; 59(4): 369‒75. (Serbian)
29. Tomić G, Nikolić J, Punišić S, Subotić M, Zidverc-Trajković J. Neurorehabilitation of alexia without agraphia-a case report. Med Pregl 2018; 71(9–10): 309–13.
30. Kent G, Rosanoff A. A study of association in insanity. Am J Insanity 1910; 67(1): 37–96.
31. Meara P. The study of lexis in Interlanguage. In: Davies A, Howart A, Criper C, editors. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1984. p. 225–35.
32. Lukić V. Children's frequency dictionary. Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research; 1983.
33. Cremer M, Dingshoff D, de Beer M, Schoonen R. Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. Int J Bilingual 2011; 15(2): 187–204.
34. McGregor KK, Berns AJ, Owen AJ, Michels SA, Duff D, Bahnsen AJ, et al. Associations between syntax and the lexicon among children with or without ASD and language impairment. J Autism Dev Disord 2012; 42(1): 35–47.
35. DiPisa T. The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift in word associations evidence from multilinguals and monolinguals [dissertation]. United States, Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University; 2016.
36. Fergadiotis G, Wright HH. Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology 2011; 25(11): 1414–30.
37. Fergadiotis G, Wright HH, West TM. Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pat 2013; 22(2): S397–S408.
38. Stokes SF, Fletcher P. Lexical diversity and productivity in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2000; 35(4): 527–41.
39. Thordardottir ET, Weismer SE. Verb argument structure weakness in specific language impairment in relation to age and utterance length. Clin Linguist Phonet 2002; 16(4): 233–50.
40. Chotlos, JW. Studies in language behavior: IV. A statistical and comparative analysis of individual written language samples. Psychol Monogr 1944; 56(2): 75–111.
41. Templin, M. Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press; 1957.
42. Kambanaros M, Grohmann KK, Theodorou E. Action and object naming in mono-and bilingual children with language impairment. In: Botinis A, editor. Proceedings of the 3rd Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics; 2010 Aug 25–27; Athens, Greece. ExLing 2010. p. 73–6.
43. McGregor KK, Newman RM, Reilly RM, Capone NC. Semantic representation and naming in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear R 2002; 45(5): 998–1014.
44. Sheng L, McGregor KK. Object and action naming in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear R 2010; (53): 1704–19.
45. Löfkvist U, Almkvist O, Lyxell B, Tallberg M. Lexical and semantic ability in groups of children with cochlear implants, language impairment and autism spectrum disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78(2): 253–63.
46. Mainela-Arnold E, Evans JL, Coady JA. Explaining lexical semantic deficits in specific language impairment: The role of phonological similarity, phonological working memory, and lexical competition. J Speech Lang Hear R 2010; 53(6): 1742–56.
47. Hewitt LE, Hammer CS, Yont KM, Tomblin JB. Language sampling for kindergarten children with and without SLI: Mean length of utterance, IPSYN, and NDW. J Commun Disord 2005; 38(3): 197–213.
48. Redmond SM. Conversational profiles of children with ADHD, SLI and typical development. Clin Linguist Phonet 2004; 18(2): 107–25.
49. Tomblin JB, Hardy JC, Hein HA. Predicting poor – communication status in preschool children using risk factors present at birth. J Speech Hear Res 1991; (34): 1096–105.
50. Fox AV, Dodd B, Howard D. Risk factors for speech disorders in children. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2002; 37(2): 117–31.
51. Duncan N, Schneider P, Robertson C. Language abilities in five- through seven-year-old children born at or under 28 weeks gestational age. J Med Speech Lang Pa 1996; 4: 71–9.
52. de Vries LS, Jongmans MJ. Long-term outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95(3): F220–4.
53. Sansavini A, Guarini A, Alessandroni R, Faldella G, Giovanelli G, Salvioli, G. Are early grammatical and phonological working memory abilities affected by preterm birth? J Commun Disord 2007; 40(3): 239–56.
54. Fliessbach K, Buerger C, Trautner P, Elger CE, Weber B. Differential effects of semantic processing on memory encoding. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31(11): 1653–64.
55. Humphreys MS, Li YR, Burt JS, Loft S. How semantic processing affects recognition memory. J Mem Lang 2020; 113: 104–9.
56. Bishop DV. How does the brain learn language? Insights from the study of children with and without language impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42(2): 133–42